Armenia is getting rid of the Soviet Past

07 May, 2018 | |

Experts of the Ukrainian council on foreign relations described the ongoing internal developments in Armenia and underlined the roots of the mass protests in this country:

  • Protests began in mid-April after Sargsyan was appointed Prime Minister. Sargsyan had previously served as Armenian president for 10 years, and the thousands of protesters who hit the streets of Yerevan saw his latest appointment as an unconstitutional power grab.
  • Under constitutional changes Sargsyan promoted in 2015, the prime minister became more powerful than the president, leading to concerns of authoritarian rule descending on the small former Soviet republic, which borders Azerbaijan, Turkey, Iran and Georgia.
  • Sargsyan stepped down as Prime Minister. His deputy, Karen Karapetyan, was then named acting Prime Minister at an emergency Cabinet meeting.
  • Armenians have seen their country, once the poster child for democratization after the collapse of the Soviet Union, stagnate in the hands of an entrenched oligarchy while many citizens choose to leave.

Description of what is going on

  • Pashinyan, 42, lost a parliamentary vote on Tuesday to become interim prime minister.
  • The vote followed the resignation last week of former prime minister Serzh Sargsyan, who was forced to step down amid weeks of mass demonstrations, led by Pashinyan's movement.
  • But Pashinyan's bid to become the new prime minister was stopped by the Republican party, which holds a majority in parliament and is allied to Sargsyan, after nine hours of bad-tempered debate.
  • After losing the vote, Pashinyan called for protests on Wednesday.
  • Protestors blocked streets in the capital and other small city in the country.
  • Less than 1 million people live in the capital and therefore hundreds of thousands of protestors on the streets are considered as a significant number.
  • Pro-Russian majority in the Parliament rejected decisively the candidature of Pashynyan.

Russia’s reaction

  • Russia is likely to be watching the outcome of it's former Soviet republic closely -- the countries maintain close relations, with Moscow also an important provider of military hardware to Yerevan.
  • While Russia does not share a border with Armenia, it wields serious regional influence.
  • When fighting broke out in 2016 between Azerbaijan and the Armenia-backed region of Nagorno-Karabakh, the Russian government quickly brokered a ceasefire.
  • But the Kremlin is also suspicious of what Russian officials describe as "colored revolutions" -- democratic uprisings that have led to the ouster of friendly governments in Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere -- as well as opposition demonstrations at home.
  • So far, Pashinyan has focused his criticism on domestic issues, rather than relations with Russia. How that would play out were he to be elected prime minister, is yet to be seen.

Чи відходить Україна «на другий план»?

Джеймс Девіс
Джеймс Девіс Професор-міжнародник із Університету Санкт-Галлена

На нещодавній Мюнхенській конференції з безпеки "українське питання" опинилося в "другому ешелоні" проблем - головними темами все ж стали нова політика США за президента Трампа та міжнародний тероризм.

Геополітичні аспекти Угоди про асоціацію між Україною та ЄС

Єжи БУЗЕК (Jerzy Karol Buzek)
Єжи БУЗЕК (Jerzy Karol Buzek), депутат Європарламенту від Польщі, політична група «Європейська народна партія»

Ми добре розуміємо і усвідомлюємо всі геополітичні моменти, які беруть свій початок у минулому, в нашій історії. І ми повністю готові тісно співпрацювати з Україною на основі Угоди про асоціацію, включно із угодою про створення зони вільної торгівлі.

Україні треба реальна фінансова допомога

Роберт Кан (Robert Kahn)
Роберт Кан (Robert Kahn), старший фінансовий аналітик, Рада зовнішніх зносин, США

На фоні драматичних переговорів щодо врегулювання ситуації на Донбасі, результати переговорів між Україною та Міжнародним валютним фондом відійшли на другий план. Однак важливим стало досягнення домовленості про виділення України кредиту МВФ на суму 17,5 млрд. дол. США.