The president of Russia Putin visited Republic of Belarus at the beginning of July, 2014. He had a restricted meeting with the president of Belarus Lukashenko. There is no information about the issues discussed on this meeting. But the Geostrategy Group has received some indications that the plan of possible entering Russian army through the territory of Belarus to Ukraine was discussed. What Ukraine should think as an adequate response to this potential challenge?

The ongoing political and military tensions that are now taking place in the Eastern Ukraine – Donbas and Luhansk –clearly show that huge geopolitical rift is appearing on the border between Europe and Eurasia. Russian has already made its choice. Ukraine is also doing its own, but with very painful consequences.

The dippiest political crisis in the Ukrainian-Russian relations occurred since 1990th and dramatically caused to the brutal annexation by Russia the territory of Crimea has threatened seriously the neighboring country – Romania. What political, military and energy strategy Bucharest will choose for responding to facing the mentioned dramatic challenges?

The Common Agricultural Policy's share in the European Union budget has decreased significantly over time, from around 70 percent in the 1960s to roughly 40 percent in the 2010s, and will probably keep decreasing in the future. The progressive transition to service economies, in which agriculture is not as important, partially explains this factor.

Якщо ви бажаєте отримати цей матеріал заповніть будь ласка форму. Ми вийдемо з вами на зв’язок.

Falling of Yanukovych’s regime caused by pressure from civil society, and the annexation of the Russian Federation a part of Ukraine, spooked Central Asia. Primarily - Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, where significant Russian-speaking population are living. The local residents fear that the Kremlin could use this as an excuse for domestic interference in their lives by playing the same "Crimean card."

Some strange so-called political tranquility of the European Union during the unfolding crisis in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea forced the Geostrategy group to thinking about the motives standing behind this the EU approach. As consequences the interesting thing was unexpectedly discovered: why Berlin might permit Russia to take the Crimea off Ukraine.

The Geostrategy considers the crisis situation in the Crimea in a broader international context. In the world today there are many conflict zones, similar to the situation in the Autonomy. These conflicts are in various stages of development, but the brutal behavior of Russia could cause them sharp aggravation and, consequently, the occurrence of latent conflicts in the “hot phase”.

The Geostrategy considers the crisis situation in the Crimea in a broader international context. In the world today there are many conflict zones, similar to the situation in the Autonomy. These conflicts are in various stages of development, but the brutal behavior of Russia could cause them sharp aggravation and, consequently, the occurrence of latent conflicts in the “hot phase”.

The ongoing profound political crisis in Crimea is affecting the whole Black sea region. Turkey, which is a Ukraine’s strategic partner, is strangely keeping the silence on this matter. What reasons are behind of this rather strange Turkey’s behavior? Are there any secret agreements reached between Turkey and Russia – the country which is deeply and quickly sliding into the international isolation?

The constitutional reforms in two neighboring countries – Hungary and Romania – are aiming at enforcing the Parliaments and weakening the Presidents in both countries. These trends are happening because these two countries intend to react more quickly on the geopolitical challenges that appear in the region of the Eastern and Central Europe. What does it mean for Ukraine?